Politics and Gambling 2015: Match Made in Heaven or Arranged Marriage?

Politic<span id="more-9615"></span>s and Gambling 2015: Match Made in Heaven or Arranged Marriage?

Politics and gambling were front and center in the 2015 landscape. Hillary Clinton is the favorite to end up being the Democrat nominee for the 2016 election that is presidential and her stance on gaming continues to be a little murky.

Politics and gambling are quite similar in theory. Both involve strategizing and calculating, using odds into consideration, and deciding just how to proceed in the interest that is best of an individual’s self.

Regarding politicians addressing the presssing issue of gambling, this issue becomes a bit more technical. Lawmakers understand that casinos bring the risk of increased tax revenues that translate to monies that are additional could fund state governments that are currently struggling to create ends meet.

Republicans and Democrats rarely agree on anything in today’s divisive governmental climate, and when it comes to gambling, these hardened foes aren’t exactly sure where to face. Perhaps because online gaming, in particular, is neither liberal nor conservative, but a bit of each, there’s no cut that is clear, irrespective of your party or standpoint.

With all that in mind,we take a look straight back on this year that is past struggles with politics and gambling, and what seems to lie ahead in 2016.

The Race for 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

It’s shaping up to be Hillary Clinton versus the still-uncertain GOP nominee next November. Whether it’s Donald Trump, Dr. Ben Carson, Florida Senator Marco Rubio or another Republican candidate, something is almost for several, and that is Clinton will be their opponent.

Hillary Clinton

Hillary’s past in regards to gambling is just a bag that is rather mixed. Then-New York Senator Clinton voted in favor regarding the Internet that is unlawful Gambling Act (UIGEA) of 2006, a bill that essentially made online betting illegal.

Nonetheless, two years later, Clinton said she was at favor of investigating just how gambling that is online be properly regulated. The Democratic front runner hasn’t addressed the emerging concerns of daily dream sports (DFS) as of yet.

Donald Trump

The surprising GOP leader is unsurprisingly perhaps gambling’s best bet for expansion of casinos, both land-based and online. Being a casino that is former himself, the Donald probably will do small or nothing to block any federal legislation that could restrict states‘ rights from deciding unique gaming laws.

Marco Rubio

Rubio has issued rather contrasting views on gambling. The first-term senator co-sponsored the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) in 2015, a bill that would outlaw all forms of online gambling.

However, he also hinted this October that RAWA might need an amendment for Internet poker, as it has aspects of ability, but he’s remained steadfast against expanding gambling at land-based venues.

Dr. Ben Carson

The former Johns Hopkins neurosurgeon has remained quiet in the issue of gambling, and since he doesn’t have political or gambling background, their record is vacant.

Speaker Paul Ryan

Though House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin) isn’t an advocate for gambling or online casinos, he isn’t necessarily against the marketplace. The nine-term congressman opted not to vote on UIGEA in 2006 and in addition chose to not sign RAWA despite the fact that 21 of his Republican peers did.

The main one concern with Ryan among gambling supporters is he is employed Dave Hoppe as his chief of staff. Hoppe is a Washington, DC, lobbyist who has worked on behalf of billionaire Sheldon Adelson.

Sheldon’s Crusade

No man was more active in 2015 gambling that is political than billionaire and long-time GOP supporter Sheldon Adelson. The Las Vegas Sands president is no stranger to politics or Congress, and definitely knows what the expression ‚money talks‘ is all about.

Worth roughly $30 billion, Sheldon’s made it his mission that is personal to online casinos by using their political clout among GOP lawmakers to push RAWA in the Senate and House of Representatives.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) and Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) obliged and introduced the bill to their respective chambers, though it’s generated action that is little. Don’t expect RAWA to magically disappear anytime quickly, the billionaire stating he’ll spend ‚whatever it takes‘ to quit Internet gambling. But it doesn’t appear to be threatening the shutdown of the three states that are legal either.

2016 will be a year that is important just due to the impending presidential election, but in component because of the rise of daily fantasy contests. The return of PokerStars to nj will also bring added attention to online gaming.

RAWA in 2015: The Long and Winding path That Led to Confusion and Contention

Year billionaire Sheldon Adelson is funding the RAWA journey, and though the legislation idled in 2015, the excursion will continue after the New. (Image: politico.com)

RAWA endured a lengthy 2015 campaign in which the legislation that aims to block all types of online gambling failed to achieve momentum that is much Congress, despite several lawmakers advocating on its behalf.

Formally known as the Restoration of America’s Wire Act, RAWA was initially introduced in the Senate and House of Representatives in March of 2014 by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) and Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah).

The bill was mostly overshadowed in Washington, DC, during its initial introduction as elected leaders inside the Beltway were focused on the so-called ‚cromnibus,‘ a head-scratching emergency bill that fundamentally funded the government that is american 2015.

Graham and Chaffetz reportedly attempted to slide RAWA into the cromnibus package, but the bill eventually passed free of any gambling legislation.

RAWA’s defeat in 2014 didn’t hamper its proponents‘ inspiration for this present year’s legislative calendar. Backed by billionaire Sheldon Adelson, the $30 billion Las Vegas Sands owner who desperately wants online casinos outlawed, Graham and Chaffetz when again introduced the proposal with their chambers.

Chaffetz’s Hearing Help

Carrying out a February presentation of RAWA, Chaffetz used his sitting on the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations to carry a hearing that is formal the good qualities and cons of delivering Internet betting into prohibition.

The committee invited five witnesses to testify, but it was evident right away the majority was at benefit of RAWA. University of Illinois Law Professor John Kindt even stole line directly from Adelson when he stated, ‚Click your phone, lose your house … click your mouse, lose your household.‘

What little coverage the RAWA hearing received was rather negative, media pundits identifying the bias among the invitees. That led to Chaffetz ultimately neglecting to gain much support from his House colleagues, RAWA basically being shelved into the aftermath.

Graham’s Bad Timing

Timing is everything, and Graham’s decision to re-enter RAWA in to the Senate arrived at what was possibly the absolute most ill-advised time the sc politician might have chosen.

On the day before nine victims of the Charleston, sc, shooting had been set to rest, Graham quietly reintroduced RAWA.

Poker Players Alliance Executive Director John Pappas condemned the action saying, ‚we think I speak for most Americans when I express profound dissatisfaction in Senator Graham for choosing this club player casino no deposit bonus codes dec 2017 time to advance a bill for the sole advantageous asset of a billionaire political donor.‘

Graham’s bill has sat quietly ever since, attracting more dust into the halls regarding the US Capitol than White House fourth-tier china.

The DFS Factor

RAWA is thought to have predominantly struggled in 2014 and much of the past 12 months because the subject of online gambling simply was not relevant enough for middle-of-the-road politicians to tackle. But which may have changed now, thanks to fantasy that is daily (DFS).

DFS had been outlawed by Nevada and brand New York, and multiple other states are currently pondering the legality of the contests. Should Congress intervene, that could theoretically open the floodgates for additional gaming that is anti-online.

In Memorium, Nearly

Finally, both a House Oversight and Government Reform (OGR) meeting on Dec. 9th and a failure (once once again) to incorporate RAWA within an end-of-year spending bill means that RAWA may live to see a later date in 2016, but most likely it’s going to be gasping for breathing as well as on a heart-lung machine that is adelson-funded.

The 2015 On Line Gambling State-by-State Review: Plenty Of Talk, Not Much Action

On line gambling was once again a topic that is active state and federal lawmakers, and also as the discourse continues, billionaire Sheldon Adelson continues his efforts to fight it off. (Image: Jeff Scheid/Las Vegas Review-Journal)

Online gambling earned plenty of floor time in state capitols across the country’s 50 states in 2015.

The movement had been fueled by a select few who believe legalizing Internet betting could provide revenue that is substantial for state tasks while also protecting citizens and adolescents from accessing rogue offshore sites. These legislators then persuaded colleagues to open an ear.

On the reverse side of this issue ended up being powerful Las Vegas casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson funding political action committees and pressuring federal lawmakers to stop the market that is growing.

The dubious topic of ending prohibition that is online 47 of the 50 states was often discussed, but never ever made it out from the park. Here is a state-by-state recap of exactly what happened over the final 12 months.

Who Did Exactly What

Ca: The Golden State would offer a boost that is beneficial on-line poker and online gambling, but America’s many populated state idled regarding its passage in 2015. Several bills were introduced, however a battlefield that is complicated lawmakers, Native Americans, and racetracks led to deadlock.

Pennsylvania: The Keystone State appears poised to become the fourth state with legalized iGambling in 2016. Led by State Rep. John Payne (R-District 106), the Republican-controlled legislature might have to legalize in purchase to combat Democrat Governor Tom Wolf’s increased investing.

Texas: The sun seems to be rising regarding gambling that is online the state for which poker’s most popular game was named. The Texas lottery reached out to Delaware to learn more about its market in late October. Congressman Joe Barton (R) is definitely in favor of legalizing iPoker, and it is apparently momentum that is gaining.

Massachussetts: No state did more gambling that is regarding land-based casinos in 2015 than Massachusetts. The Plainridge Park Casino opened in June, while the MGM Springfield and Wynn Everett are under construction. But on the web gambling remains a no-go for the time being.

New Hampshire: In April, state lawmakers greatly shot down yet another bill to authorize land-based casinos. iPoker fans in the ‚Live Free or Die‘ state have little to be excited about, charitable poker games also drawing scrutiny in 2015.

Wisconsin: Badgers will continue waiting to relax and play poker outside a Wisconsin judge upholding the state’s poker ban by citing a 1964 ruling.

Michigan: The Spartan State has a history that is long of gambling, but that is not the case with online casinos. A Michigan State University study discovered that the continuing state would benefit from legalizing the industry, but lawmakers have been weary to proceed.

Nevada and Delaware: Two states that legalized online gaming before 2015, Nevada and Delaware attempted to breathe life into their struggling iPoker companies by formally launching a compact that is interstate. The pact hasn’t solved the problems of player liquidity as hoped, but.

Florida: The Sunshine State is definitely targeted by commercial casino operators for its high population of seniors, but elected leaders have repeatedly knocked down efforts to reduce the monopoly on gaming native tribes have. Online gambling appears to be an even longer shot for passage.

New Jersey: The only other state with Nevada and Delaware to offer legal and regulated online gaming, New Jersey has its market placed for a monstrous 2016 after it granted PokerStars an operating permit in late September. The Garden State is additionally trying to legalize sports that are traditional, a lawsuit set to be heard in February of next year.

Brand New York: The Empire State was operating towards its very own authorization of online gambling in 2015 until day-to-day fantasy sports (DFS) exploded. With numerous bills presented, all gaming legislation took a straight back seat once New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman forced to make DFS unlawful in his state. Which brings us to…

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.